Taxonomic notes, new species, and new records of Neotropical Cerambycidae (Coleoptera)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Santos-Silva, Antonio, Pérez-Flores, Oscar, Botero, Juan Pablo (2024): Taxonomic notes, new species, and new records of Neotropical Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). The Canadian Entomologist (e 21) 156: 1-20, DOI: 10.4039/tce.2024.14, URL: https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2024.14AbstractHaplidus glabricollis Chemsak and Linsley, 1964 is synonymised with Limernaea ochracea (Fisher, 1927) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Oemini). Adetus scissicauda (Bates, 1874) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Apomecynini) is reinstated, and Adetus alboapicalis Breuning, 1943 is proposed as a junior synonym. Adetus salvadorensis Franz, 1954 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Laminae: Apomecynini) is redescribed and recorded from Oaxaca, Mexico. Plistonax antonkozlovi Santos-Silva et al., 2020 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Acanthoderini) and Hesychotypa danilevskyi Nearns and Nascimento, 2019 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Onciderini) are recorded for the first time for the province of Bocas del Toro, Panama. Dorcasta borealis Breuning, 1940 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Apomecynini) is newly recorded from Mexico (Yucatán). The type locality of Eupogonius longipilis Bates, 1880 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Desmiphorini) is corroborated and new state record from Chiapas, Mexico, is reported. Eupogonius vittipennis Bates, 1885 is recorded for Campeche, Mexico. Trichastylopsis skillmani new species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Laminae: Acanthocinini) is described from Jalisco and Michoacán, Mexico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".