MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Wild and Artificially Bred Blue Populations in Symphysodon aequifasciatus

2024· article· en· W6887463719 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationLinkage disequilibriumGenetic diversitySingle-nucleotide polymorphismNucleotide diversitySelection (genetic algorithm)Selective sweepGenetic variationEffective population sizeGenetic variability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

【Objective】The study was conducted to investigate the genetic diversity of Symphysodon aequifasciatus, analyze the kinship and the genetic differences of a wild population and two artificially bred blue populations, identify candidate genomic regions and loci associated with body color, and provide references for the formulation of classification system of discus fish.【Method】Whole-genome resequencing was conducted on 9 individuals from the wild population (WF), 8 individuals from the solid blue population (BF) and 10 individuals from the albino blue population (ABF), respectively. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci were obtained to calculate population genetic diversity indices, analyze population genetic structure, and perform selective sweep analysis between populations. The candidate SNPs were validated by considering SNP annotation and mutation rates combined with PCR and Sanger sequencing.【Result】A total of 1 360 293 SNPs are identified among the 3 Symphysodon aequifasciatus populations. Genetic diversity, as measured by PIC, Pi, Ho, and He, indicates a decreasing trend from the wild population to the solid blue and albino blue populations, with low heterozygosity in the selected populations. Phylogenetic tree, population structure analysis, and principal component analysis of polymorphic loci all indicate that the three populations are independent of each other and cluster within themselves. Linkage disequilibrium decay analysis indicates that the albino blue population is under significant selection pressure, followed by the solid blue population. The result of population selective sweep based on the population differentiation index (FST) and nucleotide polymorphism (Pi) reveals strong selection signals in large regions of chromosomes 3, 12, 13, 18, and 20 in the solid blue population and chromosomes 1, 16, 18, and 19 in the albino blue population. Thirteen and nine candidate SNPs are identified in the solid blue and albino blue populations, respectively.【Conclusion】The genetic diversity of the 3 Symphysodon aequifasciatus populations is relatively low, and the genetic relationships are consistent with the process of artificial breeding. USP43, FGFR2, DENND4, and MLL1 genes may be closely related to the body color formation of Symphysodon aequifasciatus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.482
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicGenetic diversity and population structure→French-language works237,207→