MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887494606 · doi:10.17026/ar/ppobcf

Pottenbakken in de Broekpolder

2024· dataset· nl· W6887494606 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDANS Data Station Archaeology · 2024
Typedataset
Languagenl
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Canadian institutionsKelowna General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)ParchmentHippopotamus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimentele archeologie heeft een prominente plaats bij AWN afdeling Helinium. Drie keer hebben ze een veldoven gebouwd om handgevormde potten te bakken, met als doel zwart aardewerk te produceren via reducerend bakken. In de Broekpolder van Vlaardingen werd een Educatief Archeologisch Erf opgericht, ideaal voor een nieuwe poging met Vlaardingencultuur aardewerk. Na het bouwen van de oven werd het aardewerk in 22,5 uur gebakken en daarna gereduceerd door extra brandstof toe te voegen en de oven te smoren. Hoewel het meeste aardewerk zwart werd, overleefden niet alle stukken het proces. De experimenten geven waardevolle inzichten, ondanks dat niet alle vragen volledig beantwoord zijn.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDANS Data Station ArchaeologySame topicImage Processing and 3D ReconstructionFrench-language works237,207