Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Er is een nieuwe versie van deze dataset beschikbaar, zie het veld 'Relations'. De bestanden van de verouderde versie zijn niet meer te downloaden.</p><p>Opinion of the inhabitants of Ede about various aspects of living in Ede: municipal service: management and maintenance, safety, ( places of ) entertainment, housing. Satisfaction with municipal facilities, social services and maintenance in own quarter / detailed questions about ( maintenance of ) public space / satisfaction with collectioning of refusal / ( reasons for not participation in ) separated collectioning of garbage / victimization in the last 12 months, informing of those crimes / perceived frequency of crimes in own quarter / perceived chance to become victim of crime in own quarter / feelings of unsafety in the evening, at night / safety: functioning of local authorities and functioning, action and availability of the police in own quarter / contact with police in the last 12 months, reasons / satisfaction with police contacts / more-less attention should be paid to specific sorts of police tasks / frequency of entertainment activities, supply of entertainment in Ede, catering industry / nuisance caused by catering in the last 12 months / aspects of social climate and living situation in Ede / monthly rent paid for house/ saleable value of own house / number of years living in present house / quality of house and housing conditions / wishes for housing, moving. Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ housing situation/ household characteristics/ occupation/employment/ income/capital assets/ education/ politics/ religion</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it