MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887806594 · doi:10.17632/hc7f9hnhxy

Dataset of images for visual and non-visual analyses of light and colour applications in architecture

2024· dataset· en· W6887806594 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMendeley Data · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureWindow (computing)Light sourcePattern recognition (psychology)Reflectivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository contains a dataset of images obtained from reduced-scale models. The main objective of this dataset was to study the visual and non-visual impact on occupants of architectural elements including lighting design strategies and colour applications. The reduced-scale models represented a generic room at 1:50 scale. The data present different interior lighting conditions in terms of light source (simulated daylight, daylight, and electric system), surface colour applications, and colour temperature. The dataset makes part of a doctoral dissertation in architecture at Laval University by Carolina Espinoza-Sanhueza, supervised by Claude MH Demers, Marc Hébert, and Jean-François Lalonde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMendeley DataFrench-language works237,207