Activities Ukrainian diaspora USA and Canada in XX century – early XXI century after materials of fund collection national museum of Ukraine history
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The material of Ukrainian diaspora life and activity in the USA and Canada in the National Museum of Ukrainian History collection is analyzed in the article. History of completing of materials and transferring of interesting exhibits during years of the Ukrainian independence is traced. Based on the wide circle of historical sources, the author confirms that the National Museum of Ukrainian History has the biggest collection from the ancient time until the nowadays, which consist of about one thousand exhibits. Scientists of the museum always try to fill the museum’s funds and collections. It is noted that methodology of the accumulation of material is based on primarily completing material of the most actual themes. The importance of the theme of data research is caused by need of investigation of Ukrainian diaspora role in the process of democratization and transformation of Ukraine, transferring of positive experience in the development of civil society, underlining of diaspora contribution to the economy and culture of our country, lobby of foreign and interior interests. In general, the author notes the interest of the Ukrainian diaspora in promoting Ukrainian historical heritage. In its turn this is evidenced by hard work of the National Museum of Ukrainian History stuff that carries out scientific work by completing and studying fund collection “Ukrainian Diaspora” regularly and fills the museum by interesting exhibits on this subject. This study of Ukrainian life in emigration contributes to the preservation of national identity, rapprochement and consolidation of Ukrainians worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".