A study on the form of historical and cultural districts from the perspective of Conzenian School : as the Shengjin Town District in Nanchang City for an example
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The protection of cultural relics and historic sites in my country began in the 1920s. In 1982, the State CounciI announced the first batch of 24 national historical and culturaI cities. In 1986, the State Council announced the second batch of historical and cultural cities to clearly protect historical districts (Gu,2003), according to my country The current policy standards divide the protection of historicaI and culturaI heritage into three IeveIs, namely: culturaI relics protection units, historical and cultural blocks, and historical and cultural cities (Wang, 2004 ). As a medium-scale cuIturaI heritage protection system, historicaI cultural blocks have gradually become a hot spot due to their relative culturaI integrity and operabiIity on scales, and multi-dimensionaI and comprehensive research has been launched (Dai et a I., 2012 ). In 2011, the People's Government of Jiangxi Province approved the three historicaI and culturaI districts including longevity PaIace (Wanshou PaIace), Shengjin Tower and jinxiancang Historic District in the protection plan for the famous historicaI and culturaI city of Nanchang. "The Nanchang Metropolitan Area Plan (2015-2030) was annouced in 2016" pointed out that the "One City, Three Streets, Four" historical and cultural blocks and historical features of Nanchang City should be protected. In 2017, the "Shengjin Tower Historical and CulturaI Block Protection Plan (2015-2020)" was proposed for the construction of the planned area. The land is changed to commerciaI land for unified commerciaI development. In the process of urban replacement, historical and cultural blocks are inevitably destroyed, leading to the loss of traditional style and existing historical structure. Conzenian School of Urban Morphology is used to study the historicaI and cultural blocks of Shengjin Tower and analyze its historical causes. The protection and re new a I have median level research significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".