MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6887983812 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.25443139

From plankton to whales: Oceanography of a traditional whale feeding ground and marine park in the St. Lawrence estuary

2002· other· en· W6887983812 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2002
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKrillCapelinWhaleUpwellingEstuarySmeltPlanktonCurrent (fluid)Channel (broadcasting)Rookery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No abstracts are to be cited without prior reference to the author.The head of the main channel of the eastern Canadian continental shelf is a traditional whale feeding ground that is part of the first Canadian marine park and one of the most intensive whale-watching sites in the world. In mid 1990's, a research program was launched to understand the basic oceanographic processes responsible for this ecosystem hot spot of eastern Canada. Multifrequency acoustics, direct sampling and standard oceanographic measurements were used to map the distribution and abundance of the two whale preys, krill and capelin. Data were interpreted with the help of a high-resolution three-dimensional tidal circulation model of the area. The area was found to be the site of the richest krill aggregation in the Northwest Atlantic. It results from the pumping of waters from the krill-rich intermediate layer by the estuarine circulation and intensive upwelling combined with the negative phototactism of krill. Current structure and hydrodynamic control at the sills determine the mesoscale pattern of the aggregation. Capelin concentrated at the channel head banks and along the slopes. Flooding currents and upwelling were concentrating them at the slopes, and along the fronts that form at the interfaces between water masses. Flooding increased the contact between the two preys. Whales take advantage of the cyclical concentration of capelin at the slopes and of the richest krill concentrations further downstream.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→