MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887989951 · doi:10.17895/ices.pub.18674417

Tusk (Brosme brosme) in the Northeast Atlantic

2022· report· en· W6887989951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) · 2022
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationStock (firearms)MicrosatelliteFishingGenetic dataGenetic similarity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the genetic information that has been analyzed in 2007, ICES presents advice for the following stock units of tusk: Subareas I and II (Arctic); Division Va and Subarea XIV; Division XII excluding XIIb (Mid-Atlantic Ridge); Division VIb (Rockall); Other areas (IIIa, IV, Vb, VIa, VII, VIII, IX, and XIIb). This latter grouping is a combination of isolated fishing grounds and these areas are grouped due to their mutual lack of data. The new perception of the stock structure is based on considerations of new genetic information in 2007 (ICES, 2007). Studies using recently developed microsatellite primers detected highly significant genetic differentiation in tusk within its North Atlantic range. In particular, tusk around Rockall, the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, and off Canada, most likely represent different biological populations that clearly warrant separate management considerations. For the remainder of the North Atlantic this study uncovered limited genetic differentiation and no firm conclusion can be reached at present regarding the number of populations and assessment units. Samples from Storegga and Tromsøflaket (ICES Subarea II) are similar and may represent a single population in this area, and likewise for Greenland and Iceland. Tusk from around Faroe Islands differ significantly both from those from Iceland and Tromsøflaket, but the differences are small and it is at present unclear how these differences should be interpreted in terms of management implications. The geographical coverage of this study is insufficient to exclude the possibility of additional genetically differentiated populations of tusk. More samples are required from around Iceland, Faroe Islands, Hatton Bank, and Western Scotland to disentangle potential structure within and among these areas. Before 2008, ICES has advised for three management units proposed on the basis of apparent isolation of fishing ground: I and II (Arctic), Va (Iceland), and IIIa, IVa, Vb,VI, VII, VIII, IX, XII, and XIV (other areas).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.307
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.028 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES)French-language works237,207