MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6887992644 · doi:10.18130/emzk-r188

Essays on Institutions and Development

2025· article· en· W6887992644 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLibra · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeverage (statistics)AccountabilityBankruptcyPublic serviceDebtGovernment (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Local governmentService delivery framework

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I study how institutions shape access to public services and financial inclusion, particularly for marginalized populations. The three chapters of this dissertation examine the roles of religious organizations, formal financial systems, and local democratic institutions, in determining the supply of, and participation in public services. In the first chapter, I evaluate how decentralized religious organizations influence the government’s public service delivery patterns. I focus on village-level religious centers led by influential leaders in Punjab, India. These centers often act as informal support structures in rural areas, especially where state capacity is limited. I leverage historical patterns in the spread of religious sects to construct an instrumental variable and isolate the causal impact of these centers on the presence of village-level government services. Areas with these religious institutions receive a higher number of public services, particularly in education and health, which are managed at midlevels of governance. Surveys with local village council members suggest that these leaders help coordinate programs, contribute resources, and advocate for community needs. This study emphasizes that while these organizations can enhance service delivery, their engagement with the state introduces important questions about accountability and the social costs of these types of informal institutions. In the second chapter, I shift focus to a high-income context to examine how institutional barriers shape the experience of financial inclusion. I study Canada’s bankruptcy system to evaluate why many low-income individuals, despite being eligible for debt relief, delay or forgo filing for insolvency. Although bankruptcy is intended to provide a financial reset, high filing costs, complicated administrative procedures, and stigma potentially discourage access. I implement a randomized evaluation that lowers the financial barrier to filing and observe how participants respond. The intervention leads to an increase in filing, demonstrating how even in functioning markets, institutional frictions can block access to essential services for economically vulnerable populations. In the third chapter, I return to the rural Indian context to explore the limitations of decentralized governance in practice, with a focus on women’s political participation in local village councils. Although constitutional mandates guarantee representation for women, many elected female representatives struggle to exercise authority due to entrenched social norms, lack of formal training, and institutional discrimination. Drawing on primary survey data from village councils, I show suggestive evidence that while some women actively participate in local decision-making, many feel excluded or undermined by male colleagues and community members. Further, there is widespread proxy-representation where male family members, especially spouses, unofficially hold authority. Based on these findings, I design policy interventions that offer leadership training and support networks aimed at strengthening women’s effective participation in governance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it