MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888010112 · doi:10.17882/101369

TERIFIC 2nd Ocean Glider Deployments in the Labrador Sea

2021· dataset· en· W6888010112 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSEANOE · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliderUnderwater gliderColored dissolved organic matterBackscatter (email)Payload (computing)Submarine pipelineOptodeGlazeResearch vessel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the TERIFIC (Targeted Experiment to Reconcile Increased Freshwater with Increased Convection) project funded by the European Research Council, two G2 Slocum gliders (398 and 409) from Teledyne Webb Research were deployed offshore of Qaqortoq, southwest of Greenland, in December 2021 from the 30-m research vessel Adolf Jensen. Both gliders were retrieved in late May 2022 onboard the RV Celtic Explorer southwest of the Labrador Sea. Pumped Slocum Glider Payload CTDs (Conductivity, Temperature, and Depth) provided by Sea-Bird Electronics (Bellevue, WA) were mounted on both Slocum with a sampling frequency of 0.5 Hz. An Aanderaa oxygen optode was also fixed on both gliders, with the optode on glider 409 fitted in an outside bracket. Both gliders were equipped with WETLabs (Western Environmental Technologies Laboratories) ECO Puck that measures chlorophyll and optical backscatter (532 and 700 nm) for 398 (BB2FLSLC) and chlorophyll, colored dissolved organic matter and optical backscatter (700 nm) for 409 (FLBBCDSLC). Initial processing was done with the toolbox PyGlider and both gliders were processed with the GliderTools toolbox (Gregor et al., 2019) to determine qc temperature and salinity variables. The vertical water velocity is estimated with the GliderFlight toolbox using a steady-state flight model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSEANOEFrench-language works237,207