MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888027596 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200625

Driving Online Green Product Loyalty Through Website Personalization and Hedonic Quality Enjoyment: Evidence from Vietnamese E-Commerce Consumers

2025· article· en· W6888027596 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVietnamesePersonalizationQuality (philosophy)LoyaltyProduct (mathematics)Brand loyalty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amidst the rise of environmental awareness and e-commerce growth in Vietnam, understanding customer loyalty (CL) towards online-purchased environmentally friendly products (EFPs) remains an underexplored yet critical issue.This study examines the influence of website personalization (WP) and hedonic quality enjoyment (ENJ), in conjunction with customer trust (CT) and customer satisfaction (CS), on customer loyalty among Vietnamese e-commerce consumers.This study tested a model integrating these constructs using a quantitative survey of 668 Vietnamese online EFP buyers and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).Findings reveal that ENJ significantly enhances CS, while WP indirectly influences CS through ENJ and CT, ultimately driving CL.CT and CS positively affect CL, with CS showing a stronger effect.This research offers novel insights into the mediating roles of experiential and trust factors in fostering online EFP loyalty in an emerging market context.It underscores the importance of e-commerce platforms strategically enhancing hedonic experiences and trust to cultivate loyalty among environmentally conscious consumers in Vietnam.These findings contribute to green marketing and e-commerce literature by clarifying indirect personalization mechanisms in a unique cultural setting.These findings provide actionable insights for e-commerce platforms to enhance user experiences and foster sustainable consumption in emerging markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessFrench-language works237,207