Sediment geochemical data from the Bering Shelf and Yukon Delta, Eastern Bering Sea, June 2023
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dataset contains geochemical and grain size measurements of seabed and suspended sediment samples collected from the Bering Shelf and Yukon prodelta in June 2023. These samples were collected during the 6-12 June 2023 Arctic Chief Scientist Training Cruise, which was a short cruise on the R/V Sikuliaq during its transit from Seward, Alaska to Nome, Alaska. The cruise was sponsored by the University National Oceanographic Laboratory System (UNOLS) Arctic Icebreaker Coordinating Committee and the National Science Foundation. These data were generated as a pilot data set to understand the fate of terrestrial organic carbon in the Yukon River delta and adjacent Bering Sea. Seabed sediment was collected at three locations (MC04, MC06, and MC08) using a multicorer. One seabed sediment sample was collected using a van veen grab sampler. Suspended sediment samples were collected using a hand-deployed niskin bottle and transferred into a clean 10-liter cubitainer for transport and temporary storage. Suspended sediment was filtered on the ship within 24 hours of collection using a Geotech barrel filter with a 0.45 micron Polyethersulfone (PES) membrane filter. Multicores were extruded on deck and subsamples were transferred to sterile whirl-pak sample bags. All sediment samples were frozen and subsequently shipped back to the lab in coolers. Sediment samples were analyzed for grain size, bulk elemental composition via X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and organic carbon and nitrogen concentrations and isotopes via EA-IRMS (elemental analyzer-isotope ratio mass spectrometry). Grain size distributions were measured using a Malvern mastersizer laser diffraction particle size analyzer at the University of Colorado Boulder. Bulk elemental composition was measured on the Rigaku XRF in the Analytical Geochemistry Lab at the University of New Mexico. Total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), and carbon/nitrogen isotopes were measured at the Center for Stable Isotopes at the University of New Mexico. Prior to EA-IRMS analyses, sediment samples were acid-treated to remove inorganic carbon following the method of Galy et al., 2007. References Galy, V., Bouchez, J., & France‐Lanord, C. (2007). Determination of total organic carbon content and δ13C in carbonate‐rich detrital sediments. Geostandards and Geoanalytical research, 31(3), 199-207.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".