MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888491122 · doi:10.18739/a2rn3085p

Ensemble Mean Reanalysis Soil Temperature Dataset at 1 degree latitude/longitude resolution (60 South to 90 North), 1981 - 2018.

2022· dataset· en· W6888491122 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueUC Santa Barbara · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDegree (music)Resolution (logic)LatitudeMean radiant temperatureEnsemble averageTemperature measurement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset accompanies Herrington, T., Fletcher, C. and Kropp, H. (in Review). The Cryosphere. It is a 1 degree ensemble mean soil temperature of the 8 reanalysis and LDAS products (based on CFSR, ERA5, ERA5-Land, ERA-Interim, GLDAS-CLSM, GLDAS-Noah, JRA-55 and MERRA2), averaged over the near surface (0 - 30 centimeter, cm) and at depth (30 cm - 300 cm), between 1981-2018. All reanalysis products were remapped using a conservative remapping technique to a resolution of 1 degree latitude and longitude, based on the GLDAS-CLSM land-mask. The ensemble mean is calculated as a simple arithmetic mean of all eight products at each timestep for all grid cells that include valid soil temperature measurements for all 8 products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUC Santa BarbaraFrench-language works237,207