MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888715475 · doi:10.21966/1ty5-e654

Eelgrass Extent - Coastal British Columbia

2016· dataset· en· W6888715475 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHakai Institute · 2016
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetryPolygon (computer graphics)Geospatial analysisShapefileZostera marinaSample (material)Geographic information systemSeagrass

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset represents modeled areal extent of eelgrass meadows (Zostera marina) in coastal British Columbia, Canada. This dataset was generated between 2016 and 2017 as part of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation efforts to estimate blue carbon storage in eelgrass meadows across the Pacific Northwest. To model the areal spatial extent of British Columbia a novel tool was created for use in ArcGIS. This tool required 2 inputs: (1) the coastline data from Shorezone (ie. vector line features with attributes on the presence or absence of eelgrass along a linear extent of coastline) and (2) bathymetry data. Briefly, each line segment of coast in ShoreZone was converted to points along its vertices and points were used to generate Thiessen polygons. Thiessen polygons were clipped to a selected bathymetric contour (5 m or 3 m) based on the results of regional bathymetry analysis. The modeled outputs were compared to available mapping data from the British Columbia Marine Conservation Analysis Atlas to assess model accuracy. Please refer to the report summary for the details on methods and caveats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHakai InstituteFrench-language works237,207