The role of platelet derived exosomes in regenerative medicine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exosomes are a group of extracellular vesicles that are produced by various cells and are abundantly found in body fluids such as plasma. Due to their special structure, these small particles are able to carry and contain various compounds and establish cellular communication. Also, much attention has been paid to the ability of exosomes as new treatment option in various fields of regenerative medicine. One of the most abundant exosomes in plasma is platelet derived exosomes, which are rich in compounds found in platelet granules, such as growth factors. Since the use of platelets and platelet-rich plasma has been very effective in regenerative medicine, in recent years the use of platelet exosomes in regenerative medicine has received much attention and investigation. This review briefly examines the role of platelet exosomes in various fields of regenerative medicine, such as hair repair, wound healing, orthopedic injuries, angiogenesis, and drug delivery. The results of this study show that these microparticles have low immunogenicity, low thrombogenicity, and they are very useful and efficient in regenerative medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".