ChatKG: Visualizing Temporal Patterns as Knowledge Graph
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Line-chart visualizations of temporal data enable users to identify interesting patterns for the user to inquire about. Using oracles, such as chat AIs, Visual Analytic tools can automatically uncover explicit knowledge related information to said patterns. Yet, visualizing the association of data, patterns, and knowledge is not straightforward. In this paper, we present ChatKG, a novel visualization strategy that allows exploratory data analysis of a Knowledge Graph which associates a dataset of temporal sequences, the patterns found in each sequence, the temporal overlap between patterns, and related explicit knowledge to each given pattern. We exemplify and informally evaluate ChatKG by analyzing the world's life expectancy. For this, we implement an oracle that automatically extracts relevant or interesting patterns, inquires chatGPT for related information, and populates the Knowledge Graph which is visualized. Our tests and an interview conducted showed that ChatKG is well suited for temporal analysis of temporal patterns and their related knowledge when applied to history studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it