MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888833907 · doi:10.22146/jksks.84318

ADAPTASI DAN PERKEMBANGAN KESENIAN EBEG BANYUMASAN PADA KOMUNITAS DIASPORA JAWA DI SUMATRA SELATAN

2023· article· id· W6888833907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueIndonesian Journal of Biotechnology (Universitas Gadjah Mada) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Artistic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaQuarter (Canadian coin)Costume design

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kesenian Ebeg Banyumasan merupakan salah satu kesenian Jawa yang dibawa oleh kelompok diaspora Jawa di Desa Tegal Sari, Kecamatan Belitang 2, Kabupaten Oku Timur, Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan upaya adaptasi dan perkembangan kesenian ebeg yang menjadikannya tetap diterima, tumbuh dan berkembang pada lingkungan sosial budaya yang baru. Metode yang diterapkan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari tahap identifikasi masalah, tahap pengumpulan data, dan tahap analisis data beserta penarikan kesimpulan. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan berupa aspek kebertahanan kesenian ebeg yang tetap tumbuh secara dinamis karena adanya proses adaptasi dari sisi musikal dan pertunjukan (performance). Upaya inovasi dan pengembangan juga terus dilakukan dalam rangka beradaptasi dengan situasi dan kondisi pada lingkungan sosio-kultural di daerah transmigran, antara lain dalam hal penyesuaian bentuk, ruang, dan waktu pertunjukan terhadap konteks kebutuhan acara atau event, hingga pembauran ragam ekspresi seni dari para anggotanya yang beranekaragam (latar belakang sosial dan kultural) melalui wadah tradisi pergelaran kesenian ebeg. Seni dalam hal ini menjadi wadah interaksi budaya antar anggota masyarakat yang multi kultur dan multi etnis. \nKata kunci: Kesenian Ebeg, Diaspora Jawa, Adaptasi, Perkembangan, Interaksi Budaya

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndonesian Journal of Biotechnology (Universitas Gadjah Mada)Same topicCultural and Artistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207