''Transboundary river water quality as a core indicator for sustainable environmental development in Europe: A case study between republics of Bulgaria and Serbia''
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, the issue of the sustainable management and protection of water resources has gained increasing emphasis in environmental policies at the local, national and supranational levels. The goal of the present study is the analysis and assessment of water quality in the Bulgarian section of the Timok, Nishava and Erma (Jerma) rivers for the period 2015-2021. The quality status of the studied river courses was assessed by the values of ten physicochemical indicators and the concentrations of eight heavy metals. The analysis and assessment performed were based on the Water Act (WA) in accordance with the criteria by Directive 2000/60/EC or so called Water Framework Directive. The Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) was applied for the analysis. Achieving the goal formulated in the study could serve as a good basis for making informed management decisions
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it