Sir Martin Wood OBE FRS DL in interview with Sir Rex Richards FRS: Interview 1, Part 2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part two Sir Martin continues his account of the history of Oxford Instruments up to the 1980s, and he talks about advances on the cryogenic front, including the design of a helium-3 helium-4 dilution refrigerator, and the development of high specification superconducting magnets for NMR spectroscopy. Some of the technical challenges of working with superconducting materials are reviewed, and Sir Martin demonstrates how multi-filamentary superconducting wire is produced. The interview progresses to the appointment in 1971 of Barrie Marson as company chief executive, a decision to diversify into different markets with the formation of a medical electronics division, and further moves to encourage share ownership by the employees as confidence in the company's future increased. A discussion follows of the development of magnets for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and a decision to float the company on the London Stock Exchange in 1983 to raise capital to purchase and equip a large new factory for manufacturing MRI magnets for the medical market. In the final part of the interview, Sir Martin speaks of the successful joint venture between Oxford Instruments and Siemens for the production of MRI magnet systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".