MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888902219 · doi:10.24411/2500-1000-2020-10327

СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ НАЛОГОВЫХ СИСТЕМ РОССИИ, КАНАДЫ, ШВЕЙЦАРИИ И ЮЖНОЙ КОРЕИ

2020· article· ru· W6888902219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Law, and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTable (database)Tax reformEconomic analysisTax revenueTax credit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В статье рассмотрен опыт взимания налогов в странах с разными экономическими системами (Канада, Швейцария, Южная Корея и Российская Федерация). Проведен сравнительный анализ налоговых систем, состоящих из схожих элементов налогов и принципов налогообложения Выявлены наиболее общие тенденции и различия. Данный анализ может использоваться в дальнейшем для определения направлений совершенствования налоговой системы Российской Федерации. В заключении приведена таблица ставок основных налогов, а также определены существующие недочеты российской налоговой системы.The article examines the experience of tax collection in countries with different economic systems (Canada, Switzerland, South Korea and the Russian Federation). A comparative analysis of tax systems consisting of similar elements of taxes and taxation principles has been carried out. The most common trends and differences have been Identified. This analysis can be used in the future to determine ways to improve the tax system of the Russian Federation. In conclusion, a table of basic tax rates is provided, as well as the existing shortcomings of the Russian tax system are identified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it