Measured intrapatient radiomic variability as a predictor of treatment response in multi-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients (revised)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radiomics offers a non-invasive approach to tumor characterization, yet its application in metastatic cancers is limited by intertumor heterogeneity—variability in radiomic phenotypes across lesions within the same patient. We introduce Measured Intrapatient Radiomic Variability (MIRV), a novel metric quantifying heterogeneity using standard-of-care imaging. Applied to 397 metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients from the SARC021 trial, MIRV was calculated from pretreatment CT scans using pairwise Euclidean distance and cosine dissimilarity between lesions. Euclidean distance captures absolute differences in radiomic features, while cosine dissimilarity assesses variation in feature patterns independent of magnitude. Higher MIRV correlated with greater variability in tumor-specific response classification (TSRC) and volumetric response, independent of baseline tumor volume. In a subset with liquid biopsy data, MIRV showed a moderate association with ctDNA positivity, suggesting links to molecular heterogeneity. While MIRV was not prognostic for overall survival (OS) in the full cohort, higher MIRV was significantly associated with worse survival in leiomyosarcoma patients (n=165, p=0.007). These findings establish MIRV as a biomarker for intertumor heterogeneity, with potential to predict mixed treatment responses and guide personalized therapy in metastatic STS. Future studies should assess its relevance across other tumor types and therapeutic settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".