[Design of] three houses, Kingston upon Hull
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ‘Three Houses’ designs are for a site adjacent to ‘The Gill House’. The project is live and has been submitted for planning permission with the decision pending. The project was conceived as a vehicle to explore sustainable house design and the use of modular timber framed prefabricated construction techniques. It was also used as a further opportunity, following the ‘Gill House’ to explore the knowledge transfer relationship of research practice and teaching. The house designs are based around the use of a composite frame (steel and timber) construction. Steel elements are incorporated to allow the inclusion of shading devices and the timber frame components, which constitute pre-formed timber panels, form the rest of the structure. Each house design is different, but based on the same set of timber module dimensions. The aim is to build three houses with a zero-carbon footprint from sustainable materials.The project was accompanied by a series of student projects, which explored different aspects of the location and site, each written specifically to take advantage of any possible knowledge transfer from innovative practice to teaching and teaching to practice. The resultant house designs and student work were the subject of an invited exhibition at the Waterloo School of Architecture Public Gallery Canada. The invitation was extended after members of the Exhibition Committee within the School saw the exhibition held at the David Azrelli Gallery Ottawa. The exhibition entitled ‘Synthesis – Three Houses’ was held (?2007tbc) and had an accompanying catalogue (ISBN ???tbc) including a forward by gallery curator John McMin. Following this exhibition the authors have been invited to contribute to the forthcoming Architectural Design issue on Interior Atmospheres due for publication in 2008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.206 | 0.051 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".