MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6888987997 · doi:10.25318/1310018101-eng

Total expenditures in residential care facilities, by principal characteristic of the predominant group of residents and size of facility, Canada, provinces and territories

2019· dataset· en· W6888987997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueStatistics Canada Dissemination · 2019
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidential careResidential areaTable (database)Principal (computer security)Residential propertyData collection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This table contains 650 series, with data for years 1984 - 2009 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (not all combinations are available): Geography (13 items: Canada; Provinces; Prince Edward Island; Newfoundland and Labrador ...), Predominant group of residents and size of facility (10 items: Total; residential care facilities; Total; homes for the aged; Homes for the aged; 1 to 19 beds; Homes for the aged; 20 to 49 beds ...), Characteristics (5 items: Operating residential care facilities; Reporting residential care facilities; Reporting residential care facilities; approved beds; Operating residential care facilities; approved beds ...).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStatistics Canada DisseminationFrench-language works237,207