MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889030461 · doi:10.25384/sage.20173685

sj-xlsx-3-ehi-10.1177_11786302221107786 – Supplemental material for Investigating SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility in Animal Species: A Scoping Review

2022· dataset· en· W6889030461 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSage Journals Data · 2022
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal healthHuman healthMEDLINEPublic healthContext (archaeology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-3-ehi-10.1177_11786302221107786 for Investigating SARS-CoV-2 Susceptibility in Animal Species: A Scoping Review by Connor Rutherford, Pratap Kafle, Catherine Soos, Tasha Epp, Lori Bradford and Emily Jenkins in Environmental Health Insights

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1960.130

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSage Journals DataSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207