MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889056311 · doi:10.25384/sage.c.6630321.v1

Sex Differences in Suicide Trends Among Adolescents Aged 10 to 14 Years in Canada

2023· other· en· W6889056311 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueSage Journals Data · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuicide preventionPoison controlSuicide ratesInjury preventionOccupational safety and healthYoung adultHuman factors and ergonomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suicide rates appear to be rising rapidly among youth in North America.<sup>–</sup> Historically, adolescent males have had much higher rates than females; however, this gap may be narrowing due to rising suicides among female adolescents.<sup>,</sup><sup>,6</sup> Over the last 40 years, reported youth suicide rates in the United States have increased most disproportionately among females aged 10 to 14 years, mainly by hanging and suffocation,<sup></sup> but also by self-poisoning in the 10- to 12-year age group.<sup></sup> In Canada, reported rates among females aged 10 to 14 have also steadily increased while rates among males have remained stable or declined.<sup></sup> Although Canadian studies have presented suicide rates in young women across age brackets,<sup>S6</sup> no study has tested for sex differences in the 10 to 14 age group specifically.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSage Journals DataFrench-language works237,207