MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889057650 · doi:10.25358/openscience-2680

Aerosol particles in the summertime Arctic lower troposphere: Chemical composition, sources, and formation

2020· dissertation· en· W6889057650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGutenberg Open Science · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolArcticSea sprayParticle (ecology)Chemical compositionParticulatesTrace gasSulfateArctic geoengineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the face of drastic climate changes in the Arctic (e.g., increasing near-surface air temperatures and sea ice loss), it is important to understand both key processes driving these changes and related future implications. The coupling of aerosol, clouds, and radiation plays an important role in the Arctic climate system. However, our knowledge of summertime Arctic aerosol and related processes is limited, in part owing to a lack of airborne observations in the Arctic summer. This study focuses on natural and anthropogenic sources as well as formation processes controlling particle chemical composition in the summertime Arctic lower troposphere. Airborne in-situ measurements of aerosol particle chemical composition with diameters between 300 nm and 900 nm were performed in the Arctic summer using the single particle aerosol mass spectrometer ALABAMA. The ALABAMA particle composition analysis is complemented by trace gas measurements, satellite data, and air mass history modeling. Several pieces of evidence suggest the importance of both primary emissions and secondary processes in controlling the abundance of organic particulate matter in the summertime marine Arctic boundary layer. Single particle analysis shows that primary sea spray particles, including sodium, chloride, magnesium, and calcium, were internally mixed with organic matter. Alongside with these primary sea-to-air emissions, marine-biogenic sources contributed to secondary aerosol formation by trimethylamine, methanesulfonic acid, and/or sulfate. These particles were externally mixed from sea spray aerosol and their abundance correlated with time spent over Arctic open waters prior to sampling. In contrast, chemically aged particles, containing elemental carbon, nitrate, and/or dicarboxylic acids, dominated single particle composition above the Arctic boundary layer. The presence of these particle types was driven by transport of aerosol and precursor gases from mid-latitudes to Arctic regions. Based on air mass history analysis, mid-latitude sources included anthropogenic emissions in Europe, North America, and East Asia as well as vegetation fires in northern Canada. Together, these findings improve our knowledge of mid-latitude and regional sources that influence the vertical structure of aerosol properties in the Arctic summer. This work further provides new insights into the marine-biogenic control of composition and growth of summertime Arctic aerosol that is likely to change in future as sea ice retreats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it