MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889138739 · doi:10.25417/uic.17025668

Assessing Mastery of Laparoscopic Skills for a Junior Resident Prior to Entering the Operating Room

2021· article· en· W6889138739 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Illinois Chicago · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationTest (biology)Mastery learningEducational measurementCompetency assessment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Simulation has become a standard for developing laparoscopic skills. Common training programs base their passing scores on comparing noncompetent to competent surgeons (Fraser et al., 2003; Thinggaard et al., 2015). With the era of competency-based medical education (CBME), passing scores should be based on the expected skills from the resident for the next stage of training. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a passing score for the CanTAB test which is reflective of the skill expected of a “well-prepared” obs/gyn resident about to start assisting in the OR. The CanTAB test is a modified version of the Training and Assessment of Basic Laparoscopic Techniques (TABLT) test using supplies available in Canada (Thinggaard et al., 2014/2018, 2015). The “well-prepared” resident was operationalized as a resident who could follow explicit instructions, a 2.0 on the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (OSCORE) (Gofton et al., 2012). Methods: Residents and faculty at the University of Manitoba (UofM) obs/gyn department were recruited. Participants could complete any or all of the following: an OR assessment based on the OSCORE and Global Objective Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) tools, the CanTAB test, and/or the mastery Angoff standard-setting exercises informed by a participant’s individual results or the cumulative study results. CanTAB passing scores were calculated using two standard-setting methods: The mastery Angoff and “well-prepared” borderline regression. Results: Eleven participants completed the study: 6 residents and 5 fellows/attendings. The CanTAB scores ranged from 723(123.5) to 1625(503.4), with senior residents scoring the highest. The CanTAB passing scores were 602 for mastery Angoff-1, 862 for mastery Angoff-2, 993 (p=0.005) for the “well-prepared” regression line between the OSCORE and CanTAB scores, and 1270 (p=0.469) for the “well-prepared” regression line between the GOALS and CanTAB scores. The passing rates ranged from 25 to 100%, with the OSCORE-based regression line having the second-lowest passing rate with 25% of junior residents and 100% of senior residents and attendings passing. Conclusion: A CanTAB passing score of 993, based on the OSCORE level of 2.0 well-prepared borderline regression method, can best identify resident well-prepared to assist laparoscopic surgery with explicit instructions in the OR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Illinois ChicagoSame topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207