MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6889151434 · doi:10.25384/sage.24055594

sj-docx-1-eae-10.1177_0958305X231193873 - Supplemental material for Comparative analysis of triboelectric behavior of natural waste biomaterials and green energy harvesting

2023· article· en· W6889151434 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueSage Journals Data · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriboelectric effectRenewable energyNatural (archaeology)Natural materialsEnergy harvestingGreen waste

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-eae-10.1177_0958305X231193873 for Comparative analysis of triboelectric behavior of natural waste biomaterials and green energy harvesting by Jaspreet Kaur, Ravinder Singh Sawhney, Harminder Singh, Manjit Sandhu and Rajdeep Singh Sohal, Amandeep Singh, Maninder Singh, Sandeep Kaur in Energy & Environment

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9210.726

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSage Journals Data→Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials→French-language works237,207→