Descanso Gardens summer festival (rose), 1955
Bibliographic record
Abstract
2 images. Descanso Gardens summer festival (rose), 18 June 1955. Lomalee Thomas -- 18 years; Mrs. C.E. Elmer; Carl Dueherson. (Handout).; Supplementary material reads: "Eighteen year old Lomalee Thomas, Glendale College Sophomore and Hostess of the Descanso Gardens Summer Rose Festival at La Canada holds bouquet of Carrousel roses which were introduced to public by Mrs. C.E. Elmer of San Gabriel (center). On the right is Carl Duerhson of Montebello, hybridizer of the deep red Carrousel rose. Gold Medal Certificates were presented Mrs. Elmer and Mr. Duehrson yesterday afternoon at the Descanso Rose Festival by Fred W. Walters, vice president of the American Rose Society for bringing the Carrousel into existence. The Descanso Rose Festival will continue daily at 1418 Descanso Drive, La Canada, under auspices of the Los Angeles County Department of Parks and Recreation. Feature of the closing week will be the lawn ballet dance 'Rose Fantasy' to be offered at 7 P.M., Tuesday, June 21. It will mark the opening day of Summer, 1955, as well as the longest day of the year. In another presentation yesterday, Walters gave a Silver Medal Certificate to Herbert /c, /swim of Ontario for hybridizing the modern rose, Helen Traubel".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.499 | 0.148 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".