Real estate promotion handbill from the W. M. Garland Company predicting Los Angeles population growth for 1920, 1911
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photograph of a real estate promotion handbill predicting Los Angeles population growth for 1920, 1911. The handbill consists of two signs with captions and a "lesson" at the bottom. The top sign reads "Population -- Los Angeles 1910 --350,000 W. M. Garland & Co. 214 Wilcox Block". A caption to the right reads "In 1901 Los Angeles laughed at this sign. But we were right". The second sign reads "Population 1920 -- 1,000,000 Grasp the situation W. M. Garland & Co. Real Estate". The caption to the left reads "In 1911 All Los Angeles believes this sign. And it will become true". The writing at the bottom is as follows: "The lesson: Buy Los Angeles Realty. We specialize on high class income and inside property. W. M. Garland & Co., Pacific Electric Building Los Angeles, California". Picture file card reads "ca.1915".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.088 | 0.172 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".