MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889595864 · doi:10.25940/roper-31119402

AARP 2019 Prescription Drug Survey: New York Voters Ages 50+

2019· other· en· W6889595864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLL · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical prescriptionPrescription drugLegislatureDrugGeneric drugPrescription costsPharmacy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prescription medication cost (3); prescription drug imports (3); overall health (1); take prescription medication regularly (3); family member currently takes prescription medication (2); ability to afford prescription medication (3); importing drugs from Canada (3); FDA approved program to import prescription drugs (1); ever decide not to fill a prescription (2); personal spending on prescription medications (2); influence prescription drug companies have over your governor and state legislature (2); prescription medication shortage (1); prescription drug companies (2); prescription drug price transparency laws (1); civil action against drug manufacturers and wholesale distributors (2); Elderly Pharmaceutical Insurance Coverage (EPIC) program (1); New York State legislature (1); Governor Andrew Cuomo (1); rise in prescription drug costs (2); generic version of drugs (1); brand name drugs (1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.159
Threshold uncertainty score0.317

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.202
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLLFrench-language works237,207