MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889603890 · doi:10.26181/29389490.v1

The Looking Glass. Vol. 15 No. 2 (2011)

2011· article· en· W6889603890 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeorge (robot)PoetryPeriod (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<b>Table of Contents:</b> Conferences, websites, announcements and paper calls ... Introduction Purposeful Dreams on Film: Building Alice's Self-Esteem in Nick Willing's <i>Alice In Wonderland</i> Early Blossoms of Genius: Child Poets at the End of the Long 18th Century Curiouser and Curiouser: An exploration of surrealism in two illustrators of Lewis Carroll's <i>Alice</i> Review - <i>Picturing Canada: a history of Canadian children's illustrated books and publishing</i> Introduction - another farewell to Harry Potter

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3620.213

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFigshareSame topicGraph Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207