MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889653098 · doi:10.25949/26517529

Improving care pathways for otitis media in First Nations children

2022· dissertation· en· W6889653098 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacquarie University · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelehealthIndigenousSustainabilityCritical appraisalHealth careCultural safetyProject commissioningQuality of life (healthcare)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Otitis media (OM) disproportionately impacts First Nations children, affecting speech and language development, social and cognitive development and, in turn, education and life outcomes. Ear and hearing care (EHC) programs are critical to early detection and management of OM. Program sustainability depends on health policy, which secures funding and resources. This thesis aimed to; (i) chart approaches, sustainability factors, and areas of focus across the EHC pathway for First Nations EHC programs in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States, and (ii) explore utilisation of two tools to appraise Australian EHC policies for Aboriginal children. Method: A scoping review was conducted to identify program core elements in high-income colonial-settler countries. A policy appraisal pilot study was conducted utilising the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool and Morestin’s Policy Appraisal Tool to evaluate feasibility of utilising these tools to assess Australian EHC policies. Results: The review identified 28 eligible studies. Programs approaches included; (i) connecting patients to specialist services, (ii) ensuring cultural safety of services, and (iii) increasing entry into EHC pathways. The policy pilot indicated that the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool has dimensions of cultural safety that overlap between research and policy. Morestin’s Policy Appraisal Tool indicated the feasibility of utilising this tool for analysis of Australian EHC policies. Discussion: Programs connected patients to care through outreach, mobile health clinics, and telehealth services. Cultural safety was achieved by employing Indigenous Health Workers (IHWs) or providing cultural awareness training for non-IHWs. Access to EHC pathways was increased with screening or awareness programs. The preliminary findings of the policy appraisal pilot study indicated feasibility of utilising the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool and Morestin’s Policy Appraisal Tool for appraising two separate culturally-specific EHC policies in Australia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it