MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889675819 · doi:10.25940/roper-31116890

Fairleigh Dickinson University's PublicMind: New Jersey November 2015 Poll

2015· other· en· W6889675819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLL · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresidential systemPoliticsGovernorCashState (computer science)Vice presidentDemocracyReal estate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reside in New Jersey (1); registered to vote (1); President Barack Obama job approval (1); country right direction/wrong track (1); New Jersey Governor Chris Christie job approval (1); New Jersey right direction/wrong track (1); trust which major political party in New Jersey more (1); pay inequity between men and women (2); presidential candidate matchups (4); favorability of New Jersey political figures (8); increase in state gasoline tax (4); purchase Jersey Fresh or locally grown fruits and vegetables (3); Canada geese (2); funds for preserving open spaces used for other environmental causes (1); favor raising amount of money not touched by estate tax (1); have a tattoo (1); body piercings other than ears (1); acceptable to wear facial jewelry at work (1); vote for Republican presidential candidates (1); vote for Democratic presidential candidates (1); miles driven each day (1); public employee pension system membership (1); Fairleigh Dickinson University (2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score0.976

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2920.088

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoper Center for Public Opinion Research iPOLLFrench-language works237,207