MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Empowering women in northern Ghana through maternal and child health information

2017· other· en· W6889722008 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) · 2017
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)PopulationmHealthWork (physics)Attendance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This poster is about empowering expectant women and new mothers in rural areas of northern Ghana by providing them with timely, targeted and action-oriented health information. Through the Technology for Maternal and Child Health (T4MCH) project more than 8,000 women have received weekly voice messages in their local language addressing maternal and child health (MCH) issues and partner/family support. The messages were developed in collaboration with Ghana Health Service (GHS), based on the needs of women in project location. More than 94,000 messages were delivered in the period between July 2017 and September 2018, with each woman receiving an average of 13 messages. The messaging service is combined with training and support for GHS workers in the use of ICT tools, to improve services and knowledge sharing with women and men at health facilities and in communities. To assess effectiveness and empowerment among women who received messages, T4MCH project officers (three women and one man, with support from GHS and other project staff) conducted 300 interviews involving 31 health facilities in September 2018. Women interviewed almost universally found that the information was very useful (100%), led to changes in their activities and belief systems (99%), and that they would recommend the service to others (96%). 74% of the women interviewed also felt that the messages had encouraged their partners and families to support them throughout their pregnancy u2013 assisting in household chores, providing nutritious food for the family and providing financial assistance. The empowering influence of the messages was clearly evident in the specific comments made during interviews, for example, u201cI live alone with my husband in a new communityu2026 the weekly messages I receive serve as my source of information on best ways to care for myself and I have delivered my baby without complicationsu201d. The project has thus empowered more than 8000 women and their partners to make healthy decisions for themselves and their families. Reference: T4MCH Mid-Year Monitoring Report to Global Affairs Canada, November 2018, SALASAN Consulting and Savana Signatures (not published)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0220.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.056
Open science0.0070.011
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it