MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6889929610 · doi:10.3205/21rg03

Zusammenhang zwischen Sehschärfe und intraretinaler (IRF) oder subretinaler (SRF) Flüssigkeit bei Patienten mit neovaskulärer altersbedingter Makuladegeneration (nAMD), die ein Treat-and-Extend-Regime (T&E) mit intravitrealem Aflibercept (IVT-AFL) erhielten: eine Post-hoc-Analyse der ARIES-Studie

2021· article· de· W6889929610 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueGerman Medical Science (German Research Foundation) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMEDLINENoise (video)Pregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ziel: Untersuchung der Beziehung zwischen IRF/SRF und bestkorrigierter Sehschärfe (BCVA) bei mit IVT-AFL behandelten nAMD-Patienten mit dem Ziel, eine Grundlage für Entscheidungen zur Verlängerung des Behandlungsintervalls im Rahmen eines Treat-and-Extend-Regimes zu erhalten. [zum vollständigen Text gelangen Sie über die oben angegebene URL]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGerman Medical Science (German Research Foundation)Same topicRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207