Data_Sheet_1_Stenotrophomonas maltophilia natural history and evolution in the airways of adults with cystic fibrosis.docx
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction<p>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen infecting persons with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) and portends a worse prognosis. Studies of S. maltophilia infection dynamics have been limited by cohort size and follow-up. We investigated the natural history, transmission potential, and evolution of S. maltophilia in a large Canadian cohort of 321 pwCF over a 37-year period.</p>Methods<p>One-hundred sixty-two isolates from 74 pwCF (23%) were typed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and shared pulsotypes underwent whole-genome sequencing.</p>Results<p>S. maltophilia was recovered at least once in 82 pwCF (25.5%). Sixty-four pwCF were infected by unique pulsotypes, but shared pulsotypes were observed between 10 pwCF. In chronic carriage, longer time periods between positive sputum cultures increased the likelihood that subsequent isolates were unrelated. Isolates from individual pwCF were largely clonal, with differences in gene content being the primary source of genetic diversity objectified by gene content differences. Disproportionate progression of CF lung disease was not observed amongst those infected with multiple strains over time (versus a single) or amongst those with shared clones (versus strains only infecting one patient). We did not observe evidence of patient-to-patient transmission despite relatedness between isolates. Twenty-four genes with ≥ 2 mutations accumulated over time were identified across 42 sequenced isolates from all 11 pwCF with ≥ 2 sequenced isolates, suggesting a potential role for these genes in adaptation of S. maltophilia to the CF lung.</p>Discussion<p>Genomic analyses suggested common, indirect sources as the origins of S. maltophilia infections in the clinic population. The information derived from a genomics-based understanding of the natural history of S. maltophilia infection within CF provides unique insight into its potential for in-host evolution.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".