Image 8_Prevalence and influencing factors of oral frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.tiff
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective<p>This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis, assessing the pooled prevalence and influencing factors of oral frailty in older people to assist healthcare professionals in enhancing their understanding of this condition and formulating efficient interventions.</p>Methods<p>This systematic review was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, ProQuest, the National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WAN FANG DATA, VIP Information, SinoMed and Scopus for literature published in English or Chinese from inception to June 19, 2024. Subsequently, we evaluated the potential for bias in the cross-sectional studies that met our criteria through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) tool. In contrast, we utilized the robust Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort and case–control studies. We performed statistical analyses using STATA 17 software. Prevalence was studied using a meta-analysis of a single proportion. For influencing factors, dichotomous variables were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls), and continuous variables were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls).</p>Results<p>Investigation into 17 studies encompassing 24,983 participants discovered a striking 28% overall prevalence rate for oral frailty among older individuals (95% CI 20–36%, p < 0.001). Upon assessing the literature’s quality, nine articles acquired high ratings; all others received medium ratings. These findings imply a complex interplay among biological, socio-economic, lifestyle, and disease-pharmacological factors in the manifestation of oral frailty in older adults.</p>Conclusion<p>Oral frailty is prevalent in older adults and is impacted by diverse factors. Enhanced surveillance and effective interventions for oral frailty are required in older cohorts.</p>Systematic review registration<p>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024544552, identifier CRD42024544552.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it