Gait kinematic parameters and onset/offset of EMG muscle activities during overground walking in healthy female Yucatan minipigs at different speed ranges from 0.4 m/s to 1.6 m/s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY PURPOSE: The overall goal of this study was to provide a baseline for the overground walking in the healthy Yucatan mini pigs. Specifically, we assessed the effect of overground walking speed on various gait kinematic parameters and muscle activities. DATA COLLECTED: Data were collected from nine neurologically-intact adult, female Yucatan mini pigs. The pigs were trained to traverse a straight 3.5 m walkway by following a human experimenter. A motion capture system was used for recording the biomechanics of walking. Wireless surface EMG electrodes were placed on the left and right gluteus medius (GM) muscles, the biceps femoris (BF) muscles, and the vastus lateralis (VL) muscles. For each pig, motion capture data (150 frames/sec) and EMG activity (3000 Hz) were recorded as the pigs traversed the walkway 20-120 times on a given testing day. different parameters are averaged over many strides in a specific speed range. if less than 6 strides are in a speed range, the data is excluded from the analysis. DATA USAGE NOTES:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".