Korean Telephone Conversations Transcripts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Introduction</h3><br> Korean Telephone Conversations Transcripts was produced by Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC) catalog number LDC2003T08 and ISBN 1-58563-264-3. <br> The telephone conversations on which these transcripts are based were originally recorded as part of the CALLFRIEND project. The CALLFRIEND Korean telephone speech was collected by Linguistic Data Consortium primarily in support of the Language Identification (LID) project, sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense. The calls were later transcribed for use in other projects. <br> This publication consists of 100 transcribed telephone conversations in Korean. The corresponding speech is published as <a href="../../../LDC2003S03">Korean Telephone Conversations Speech</a>. The Korean orthographic forms from the 100 trascription files serve as the head-words in the associated <a href="../../../LDC2003L02">Korean Telephone Conversations Lexicon</a>. <br> The recorded conversations are between native speakers of Korean and last up to 30 minutes, of which the transcribed speech covers between 15 to 18 minutes. All speakers were aware that they were being recorded. They were given no guidelines concerning what they should talk about. Once a caller was recruited to participate, he/she was given a free choice of whom to call. Most participants called family members or close friends. All calls originated in either the United States or Canada. <br> <h3>Data</h3><br> There are 100 time aligned text files, totalling approximately 190K words and 25K unique words. <br> All files are in Korean orthography: orthographic Korean characters are in Hangul, encoded in KSC5601 (Wansung) system, also known as EUC-KR or ISO-2022-KR. <br> Please follow this link for a sample transcript: <a href="desc/addenda/LDC2003T08.txt" rel="nofollow">txt</a> | <a href="desc/addenda/LDC2003T08.gif" rel="nofollow">gif</a>. <br> <h3>Updates</h3><br> There are no updates available at this time. </br> Portions © 2003 Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".