Bibliographic record
Abstract
Final leaf from volume 2, folio 317, end of Apocalypse of the Biblia latina, variously known as The Gutenberg Bible, The Mazarine Bible or The 42-line Bible.Evidently from the missing second volume of the Fulda Gutenberg Bible of which the first volume is now in the Hessische Landesbibliothek in Fulda, Germany - see Eric Marshall White. 'Editio princeps: A history of the Gutenberg Bible.' New York: Harvey Miller, 2017. Recorded in the census of vellum fragments in ‘The Gutenberg Bibles that survive as binder’s waste’ by Eric Marshall White, in 'Early printed books as material objects. Proceedings of the conference organized by the IFLA Rare Books and Manuscripts Section. Munich, 19-21 August 2009.' Bettina Wagner and Marcia Reed, eds. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 2010, pages 21-35. Printing: Text in two columns of 42 lines. Printed in black with MS rubrication in red. Paper: Vellum. Bound in 20th-century quarter goat vellum and blue cloth enclosure with linen ties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.492 | 0.390 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".