MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6891651103 · doi:10.4230/dagrep.12.1.35

Mobility Data Mining: from Technical to Ethical (Dagstuhl Seminar 22022)

2022· report· en· W6891651103 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISTI Open Portal · 2022
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaDalhousie University
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungEuropean Commission
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Research ethicsEthical issuesInformation ethicsField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 22022 "Mobility Data Analysis: from Technical to Ethical" that took place fully remote and hosted by Schloss Dagstuhl from 10-12 January 2022. An interdisciplinary team of 23 researchers from Europe, the Americas and Asia in the fields of computer science, ethics and mobility analysis discussed interactions between their topics and fields to bridge the gap between the more technical aspects to the ethics with the objective of laying the foundations of a new Mobility Data Ethics research field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0170.046
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.240
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISTI Open PortalFrench-language works237,207