MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6891659755 · doi:10.4224/crm.2023.thca-1

THCA-1: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid Calibration Solution Certified Reference Material

2023· other· en· W6891659755 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueNRC Digital Repository · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationMass fractionCertified reference materialsFraction (chemistry)ImpurityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THCA-1 is a calibration solution certified reference material (CRM) for the cannabinoid delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ9-THCA), in acetonitrile. This material, distributed in 1 mL units, is intended for instrument calibration, method development, validation, and quantitation of Δ9-THCA in cannabis, hemp, and other cannabis-derived products. Certified values for the mass fraction and mass concentration of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid in THCA-1 have been established. The information values for the mass fraction and mass concentration of minor impurities in THCA-1 are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNRC Digital RepositoryFrench-language works237,207