MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

卒中后感染对急性缺血性卒中患者出院结局的影响 Effects of Post-stroke Infection on Discharge Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

2023· article· zh· W6891667590 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinary systemLogistic regressionDiabetes mellitusMultivariate analysisStroke (engine)White blood cellRisk factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的 探讨急性缺血性卒中(acute ischemic stroke,AIS)不良出院结局的影响因素,以及感染对出院结局的影响。 方法 回顾性连续纳入2019年6月—2022年6月在首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经内科住院治疗的AIS患者,根据出院结局分为结局良好组(mRS评分<3分)和结局不良组(mRS评分≥3分或住院期间死亡),比较两组患者的临床特点和卒中后感染(肺部感染、尿路感染及中枢神经系统感染)等指标的差异。进一步采用多因素logistic回归分析AIS患者不良出院结局的影响因素。 结果 共纳入AIS患者1024例,平均年龄(60.3±12.4)岁,其中男性788例(77.0%),出院结局良好组761例(74.3%),结局不良组263例(25.7%)。85例患者出现卒中后感染,总体感染发生率为8.3%,其中69例(6.7%)为肺部感染,16例(1.6%)为尿路感染,3例(0.3%)为中枢神经系统感染。多因素分析结果显示,卒中后出现肺部感染(OR 2.522,95%CI 1.318~4.828,P=0.005)、合并糖尿病(OR 1.486,95%CI 1.048~2.106,P=0.026)、入院NIHSS评分升高(OR 1.286,95%CI 1.233~1.342,P<0.001)和血白细胞计数升高(OR 1.094,95%CI 1.014~1.180,P=0.020)为AIS患者不良出院结局的危险因素。 结论 肺部感染可显著增加AIS患者出院结局不良的风险。 Abstract: Objective To explore the risk factors of adverse discharge outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), and the effects of post-stroke infection on discharge outcomes. Methods AIS patients who were hospitalized in the Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University from June 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into good outcome group (mRS score<3) and poor outcome group (mRS score≥3 or death during hospitalization) according to discharge outcome. The clinical characteristics and post-stroke infection(pulmonary infection, urinary tract infection and central nervous system infection) were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for adverse discharge outcomes in AIS patients. Results A total of 1024 patients with AIS were included in this study, with a mean age of (60.3±12.4) years old and 788 males (77.0%). There were 761 (74.3%) patients in the good outcome group and 263(25.7%) patients in the poor outcome group. 85 (8.3%) patients developed infection after stroke, of which 69 (6.7%) were pulmonary infections, 16 (1.6%) were urinary tract infections, and 3 (0.3%) were central nervous system infections. Multivariate analysis showed that pulmonary infection (OR 2.522, 95%CI 1.318-4.828, P=0.005), diabetes (OR 1.486, 95%CI 1.048-2.106, P=0.026), increased NIHSS score on admission (OR 1.286, 95%CI 1.233-1.342, P<0.001) and increased white blood cell count (OR 1.094, 95%CI 1.014-1.180, P=0.020) were risk factors for poor discharge outcomes in AIS patients. Conclusions Pulmonary infection may significantly increase the risk of poor discharge outcomes in patients with AIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.451
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→