MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6891687135 · doi:10.4224/40003217

Electrification of transit in a canadian operating environment: summary of stakeholder experience and consultations

2024· article· en· W6891687135 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaTransport Canada
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsElectrificationPaceTransit (satellite)StakeholderPublic transportGovernment (linguistics)Electricity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Canada, many transit agencies have plans to transition away from diesel to full electric fleets. Fleet transition to full electric comes with some uncertainties, since the technology is relatively new, and the infrastructure, operations and maintenance are different from conventional diesel fleets. In addition, long-range battery electric buses are limited in how far they can travel on a single charge, and refuel/recharge at a slower pace compared to diesel/hybrid buses. This research was carried out to better understand the experience and perspectives of stakeholders who interact with electric buses from the policy and planning stages through to end use, since the successful uptake of any technology depends heavily on its community of users and stakeholders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARCSame topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207