Multi-year Long-term Load Forecast for Area Distribution Feeders based on Selective Sequence Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long-term load forecast (LTLF) for area distribution feeders is one of the most critical tasks frequently performed in electric distribution utility companies. For a specific planning area, cost-effective system upgrades can only be planned out based on accurate feeder LTLF results. In our previous research, we established a unique sequence prediction method which has the tremendous advantage of combining area top-down, feeder bottom-up and multi-year historical data all together for forecast and achieved a superior performance over various traditional methods by real-world tests. However, the previous method only focused on the forecast of the next one-year. In our current work, we significantly improved this method: the forecast can now be extended to a multi-year forecast window in the future; unsupervised learning techniques are used to group feeders by their load composition features to improve accuracy; we also propose a novel selective sequence learning mechanism which uses Gated Recurrent Unit network to not only learn how to predict sequence values but also learn to select the best-performing sequential configuration for each individual feeder. The proposed method was tested on an actual urban distribution system in West Canada. It was compared with traditional methods and our previous sequence prediction method. It demonstrates the best forecasting performance as well as the possibility of using sequence prediction models for multi-year component-level load forecast.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".