MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892124533 · doi:10.5066/p17cryht

U-Pb Ages, Neodymium Isotope Ratios, and Trace Element Concentrations by Laser-Ablation Split Stream (LASS) Analysis of Igneous Titanite and Apatite from Interior and Southcentral Alaska

2025· dataset· en· W6892124533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUSGS DOI Tool Production Environment · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTitaniteZirconIgneous rockTrace elementApatiteInductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryMineral

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains U-Pb isotopic data and ages plus trace element concentrations from titanite and apatite in igneous rocks collected for USGS projects in the Alaska Range, Yukon Tanana uplands of eastern Alaska, and a study of ophiolites in Alaska. A subset of analyses also includes simultaneous measurements of Sm-Nd isotope ratios. For this subset, split-stream configuration analyzed U-Pb isotope ratios and trace element concentrations by quadrupole inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (Q-ICPMS), and Sm-Nd isotope ratios by multi collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS). For other samples, where grain sizes were small (<50um mean minimum grain dimension), split-stream analysis consisted of U-Pb isotope ratios by MC-ICP-MS and trace elements by Q-ICPMS. Analyzed titanite grains were hand-picked grains, separated by traditional mineral separation techniques, mounted in epoxy, as well as in-situ analyses of titanite and apatite from sample thin sections, where grains were small and unyielding to mineral separations, or where complimentary in-situ zircon analyses (Todd et al., 2023) merited complimentary in-situ titanite analyses. The sample suite was collected as part of multiple (3) distinct geological mapping and supporting geochemical and geochronological surveys, conducted between 2013 to 2021. We also analyzed portions of previously collected igneous bedrock samples from the USGS archive (collected from 1968 to 1985), allowing expansion of the dataset to include igneous bodies that were not sampled during recent field work or were outside the area of focused project field work. Titanite was obtained from these igneous rocks to determine the crystallization age for the bedrock samples. The data tables accompanying this data release report the composition of uranium (U) and thorium (Th) measured in each grain, ratios of three isotopes of lead (206Pb, 207Pb, 208Pb), two isotopes of uranium (235U and 238U), and one isotope of thorium (232Th), as well as the calculated age of each grain, plus trace element abundances from the same ablated aliquot, including P, V, Sr, high field strength elements (HFSE), and rare earth elements (REE). Reported Nd (and Sm) isotope data includes 143Nd/144Nd and 147Sm/144Nd, and calculated epsilon Nd values, and age-corrected isotope ratios and epsilon values. A summary table includes location and sample information, plus interpreted age and Nd isotopes and parameters (when interpretable).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSGS DOI Tool Production EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207