MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6892128115 · doi:10.5061/dryad.gtht76hhz

Weed seedling images of species common to Manitoba, Canada

2020· dataset· en· W6892128115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDRYAD · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Winnipeg
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaMitacs
KeywordsCirsium arvenseThistleAvena fatuaSetariaWeedEchinochloaFoxtailSetaria viridisNoxious weed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains 34666 RGB-images taken from different angles and distances of weeds common in Manitoba. The imaged species common name, scientific name, and number of their images are: Echinochloa crus-galli Large Barnyard Grass 8621 Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle 4706 Brassica napus Volunteer Canola 6723 Taraxacum officinale Dandelion 4797 Persicaria spp. Smartweed 870 Fallopia convolvulus Wild Buckwheat 4165 Avena fatua Wild Oat 1218 Setaria pumila Yellow Foxtail 3566 Furthermore, this dataset contains a trained ResNet50 convolutional neural network model. It is trained to distinguish between monocots and dicots. A small collection of test datasets is included that can be used to measure the generalization capabilities of trained models. The single-plant dataset and all test-datasets are accompanied by a csv-file containing filenames with respective labels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDRYADFrench-language works237,207