MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6892159863 · doi:10.5061/dryad.280gb5n05

Genotype data of Anoplophora Glabripennis from invasive populations in North America and native population in Asia

2024· dataset· en· W6892159863 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosecurityInvasive speciesPopulationPEST analysisIntroduced speciesGenotypeGenetic variationSample (material)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset provides genomic resources for the invasive Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis Motschulsky, ALB), a significant pest threatening global forest ecosystems. It includes 2,768 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) derived from invasive ALB populations in North America, enabling the study of genetic variation, invasion history, and population dynamics. The dataset is structured to support analyses of genetic bottlenecks, population expansions, and secondary spread patterns, offering insights into multiple independent introductions from the native range. The dataset is organized into genotype matrices and metadata, including sample locations, collection dates, and population identifiers. It is reusable for studies on invasion biology, biosurveillance, and biosecurity, providing a foundation for tracing the origins of intercepted individuals and informing pest management strategies. Legal and ethical considerations include compliance with data-sharing policies and restrictions on the use of genetic data for invasive species management. This resource is designed to enhance genome-based biosurveillance tools, supporting regulatory agencies in strengthening biosecurity measures against ALB and other invasive pests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→French-language works237,207→